mass cytometry data (Mendeley Ltd)
Structured Review

Mass Cytometry Data, supplied by Mendeley Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mass cytometry data/product/Mendeley Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Microbiota-derived H 2 S induces c-kit + cDC1 autophagic cell death and liver inflammation in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis"
Article Title: Microbiota-derived H 2 S induces c-kit + cDC1 autophagic cell death and liver inflammation in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57574-3
Figure Legend Snippet: a Heatmap showing the median expression values and hierarchical clustering of the identified subpopulations. n = 5/group. b Composition of the myeloid cells. Color as shown in A. n = 5/group. c , d Gating strategy and representative flow cytometry dot plots of c-kit + CD103 + and c-kit + CD103 - cDC1 in the liver. Lin includes CD3, CD19, NK1.1. n = 5/group. e Representative flow cytometry dot plots of hepatic c-kit + CD103 + cDC1 and c-kit + CD103 - cDC1, as well as their proportion in XCR1 + cDC1. n = 5/group. f Liver mIHC images stained with CD103 (red), c-kit (green), and XCR1 (white). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Magnification ×40, scale bar = 100 µm. Arrows indicate c-kit + CD103 + cDC1, and arrowheads indicate c-kit + CD103 - cDC1. n = 5/group and two sections were stained from each liver sample. Data were represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test ( b , d ). Significance levels were reported as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. Source data were provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Top 10 KEGG enrichment of hepatic c-kit + cDC1 from WT mice fed with NCD and WD for 30 W. n = 3/group. b GSEA analysis of Autophagy signaling. c Flow cytometry histograms of CYTO-ID (autophagic flux). n = 5/group. d Schematic of the H 2 S delivery. e Autophagic flux analysis of hepatic XCR1 + cDC1. n = 5/group. f Correlation analysis between the concentration of H 2 S and the autophagic flux of XCR1 + cDC1 in the liver. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test was performed. 95% confidence interval (0.7132 to 0.9658), P < 0.0001. g TEM showing the autophagosome and autolysosome in c-kit + DC induced in vitro. n = 3/group. h Relative expression of p62 and LC3. n = 3/group. i MTT data showing the cell survival rate of c-kit + DC induced in vitro. j MTT data showing the cell survival rate of c-kit + DC in Atg5 flox/flox and Atg5 -/- mice. n = 5/group. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. P values calculated by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test ( g , j ), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test ( c , e , i ) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test ( h ). The screening criteria for KEGG were adjusted p < 0.05 and FDR value ( q value) < 0.25, and the p value correction method was Benjamini-Hochberg ( a ). Significance levels were reported as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a – c , groups sharing no common letters indicate statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05), groups sharing partial letters indicate no significant difference ( P > 0.05). 3MA 3-Methyladenine, FDR False Discovery Rate, MTT methylthiazolyl diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide. Source data were provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay, In Vitro, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

